In every organization that has embraced the ITIL framework, the emergence of the term SLA is an inevitable milestone, and it often marks the beginning of a challenging journey. The process of crafting a well-defined SLA that is comprehensible and agreeable to all involved parties can be an arduous undertaking, particularly when attempting to articulate it in a language that is not your native tongue.
Initiating a project to implement a security control is a critical undertaking in any organization’s cybersecurity strategy. However, it often raises a fundamental and seemingly straightforward question: “When can we consider this security control fully implemented?” This query, though seemingly simple, is anything but, as it entails a multifaceted evaluation that requires careful consideration of various elements.
By adhering strictly to the Purdue model, your OT environment will exclusively consist of essential devices required for seamless factory operations, effectively mitigating IT-related threats. However, as is often the case, theory and practice diverge. In reality, the situation is more intricate. Let’s delve into the myriad facets of this issue to help you determine the optimal approach for your environment.
MTTC is the critical KPI that holds immense significance in the constantly shifting landscape of cybersecurity. This metric essentially functions as a litmus test, providing an insightful measure of an organization’s prowess in promptly identifying and efficiently mitigating cybersecurity incidents or breaches once they have successfully bypassed the organization’s digital defenses. The significance of MTTC is underscored by the relentless proliferation and escalating sophistication of cyber threats, which have collectively conspired to make achieving this KPI an increasingly formidable endeavor.
In today’s interconnected and digitized landscape, the inevitability of cyberattacks has transformed the question from a matter of ‘if’ to a matter of ‘when’. This paradigm shift underscores the critical importance of cybersecurity preparedness in the modern world. The notion that organizations and individuals will eventually experience a breach has compelled a shift from a reactive approach to a proactive and strategic stance in safeguarding digital assets.
As a vulnerability specialist, it is your job to discover all known vulnerabilities. And on its own, that is already challenging. You can wonder if you merely provide a report with discovered known vulnerabilities including steps on how to remediate them if you indeed provide value to the business. Remember, if you have set up the rights processes and configured the technology correctly, you are sitting on a pot of gold (high-value data). Therefore, the logical question is what should you be doing as a vulnerability specialist to deliver true value to the business?
Yes, true for some this is a boring topic. However, most people will try to use the excuse that as long as it is not stated in the information security policy it is allowed whatever they are doing. But then they forget the intent of the information security policy. Therefore, the question is what do you need to think about when validating and/or updating the information security policy documents?
A phishing email is a fraudulent attempt by scammers or cybercriminals to deceive recipients into revealing sensitive information, such as passwords, usernames, credit card details, or personal identification information. These emails are designed to appear as if they are sent by legitimate organizations, such as banks, social media platforms, or e-commerce websites, in order to trick individuals into providing their confidential data. And as phishing emails as a technique has proven to be effective, the adversaries will continue dispatching them. So, the question is what can you do to protect yourself? In this article, I give some tips on how to deal with phishing emails.
Currently, many people are talking about ChatGPT and how it will affect everybody’s life. Some (including me) are also investigating it. Therefore, let’s put it to the test. Does ChatGPT know how to find the right and relevant information to design and implement a use case around a password spray attack? Put differently, can ChatGPT replace the use case developer?
This is a challenging question that is not easy to answer because it depends on several things. There are good arguments for having 24×7 eyes-on-screen in a Security Operation Center. But there are also strong arguments for implementing a different model.