86,400 Seconds: Navigating the High-Stakes World of SOC Operations

Each day offers precisely 86,400 seconds—a finite resource to confront the relentless battle against known and unknown threats in the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. Every second is a test of vigilance, a race against an adversary who never sleeps. It’s an intense, unrelenting cycle in which the stakes are high and the pressure is palpable.

It sounds daunting—perhaps even overwhelming. But within those 86,400 seconds lies something powerful: opportunity. Every second is a chance to outsmart, outpace, and outlast those who seek to exploit vulnerabilities. It reminds us of our resilience, ability to adapt, and drive to protect what matters most. Welcome to the relentless world of cybersecurity, where time isn’t just a resource—it’s an adversary. In this high-stakes arena, every second matters, and the ticking clock can feel like an ever-present pressure. Nowhere is this more evident than for the SOC analyst, who faces the challenge of technical precision and the unforgiving passage of time.

Picture this: an alarm blares in the monitoring solution, signaling a potential threat. The countdown begins. In its pursuit of efficiency, measurable outcomes, and damage control, management has implemented a KPI mandating the investigation, analysis, and containment of such incidents within 15 minutes—just 900 seconds. In those seconds, the analyst must dissect the alarm, differentiate between noise and genuine threats, gather and evaluate evidence, evaluate potential impact, and implement countermeasures. The pressure is immense, and the stakes are high, yet this is the reality of the cybersecurity world. The challenge isn’t just in the actions required but in maintaining the clarity, focus, and composure necessary to make critical decisions within those fleeting moments.

Imagine this scenario: an alert requires querying multiple systems or data sources to collect essential details. Each query takes 30 seconds to deliver results, and the analyst must query four different elements to piece together the information needed for an informed assessment. That means 120 seconds—two critical minutes—are already consumed before any deep-dive analysis can begin and a decision can be made.

The alarm is now two minutes old, and the relevant data has been gathered; the real work begins: the analysis. This critical phase is typically guided by meticulously crafted Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), which outline the step-by-step processes the analyst must follow. These SOPs serve as a roadmap for less experienced team members. Experienced analysts, especially when dealing with frequently triggered use cases, often bypass the manual by relying on their expertise and familiarity with the steps. While this can save time, it also introduces potential pitfalls. Over time, familiarity can breed complacency, and the pressure to move quickly may lead to assumptions, shortcuts, or critical oversights. Laziness and complacency become the silent adversaries within the SOC, eroding the quality of investigations and response actions.

If the analysis phase also consumes 8 minutes (480 seconds), a significant chunk of the 15-minute (900-second) window has already elapsed. By this point, 600 seconds—two-thirds of the allocated time—have been used since the use case was triggered and the alert raised. That leaves a mere 300 seconds—just 5 minutes—for the SOC analyst to execute all the required activities in the response phase.

In this scenario, the SOC analyst completes all activities in 255 seconds. In total, 855 seconds have passed since the alarm was raised. This leaves a precious 45 seconds—a sliver of time—to pause, reset, and mentally prepare for the next alert. Theoretically, these moments could provide a brief but crucial window to catch a breath, review the workflow for efficiency, or even decompress from the high-stakes investigation. However, in the reality of a busy SOC, these seconds are often anything but restful.

---

Automation / Workflow management

This is where automation and workflow management systems can (and will) act as game-changers. By embedding SOPs directly into an automated workflow, the SOC can ensure the investigative process’s consistency, accuracy, and efficiency. Automating SOPs offers several distinct advantages:

1. Eliminating Guesswork: Automated workflows guide analysts through each process step, ensuring nothing is overlooked, even during high-stress situations. This acts as a safety net for junior analysts while it enforces discipline for senior staff.
2. Reducing Errors: By automating repetitive or detail-oriented steps—such as data correlation, prioritization, or enrichment—workflow management systems reduce the risk of human error, which can occur when analysts rush or make assumptions.
3. Improving Scalability: As the volume of alerts increases, automated SOPs enable the SOC to handle more incidents without sacrificing quality or response time.
4. Mitigating Complacency: Automation ensures that even the most experienced analysts adhere to the prescribed steps, preventing the gradual drift away from best practices.
5. Enhancing Visibility and Metrics: Workflow automation provides granular data on the time taken for each step, highlighting bottlenecks and areas for improvement. This helps the SOC meet KPIs and fosters continuous process improvement.

Incorporating automated workflows isn’t about replacing analysts—it’s about empowering them. Analysts can focus their cognitive energy on what truly matters: understanding and mitigating threats by automating repetitive, time-consuming tasks and providing clear, structured guidance. This combination of human expertise and machine efficiency is the cornerstone of a resilient and effective SOC.

Incorporating a SOC analyst into the use case enablement team is not just a best practice—it’s a strategic necessity. Cyber threats are multifaceted, and while each team member brings unique expertise, their combined efforts transform detection and response into a cohesive, efficient operation. The enablement team typically includes a Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) specialist, a use case engineer, and, ideally, a SOC analyst. Each of these roles addresses a critical aspect of the threat lifecycle:

1. The CTI Specialist: Focuses on understanding the adversary, analyzing threat trends, and identifying attack vectors that need to be addressed. Their work informs the scope and priority of new detection use cases.
2. The Use Case Engineer: Designs, configures, and tests detection logic, ensuring that the monitoring solutions can identify relevant indicators of compromise (IOCs) and behaviors associated with the threat.
3. The SOC Analyst: Complements these efforts by focusing on the practicalities of response. Their frontline experience equips them to assess how well the use case aids investigation, prioritization, and containment.

SOC analysts are the end users of the detection systems and use cases that the enablement team develops. Their inclusion in the process ensures that the final product identifies threats and facilitates efficient and effective response. Here’s how:

1. Practical Insight: SOC analysts bring firsthand knowledge of how alerts are triaged and investigated. They can help shape the use case to provide the most actionable data upfront, minimizing the need for additional queries and reducing investigation time.
2. Response-Oriented Design: While the CTI specialist and use case engineer focus on detecting threats, the SOC analyst ensures the response playbooks are practical and executable. For example, they can identify specific critical data points for containment or escalation decisions.
3. Streamlined Workflows: By collaborating early, SOC analysts can guide the engineering team on presenting data in a format that aligns with existing workflows, dashboards, and ITSM integrations. This reduces friction during investigations.
4. Continuous Improvement: Feedback from SOC analysts during and after use case deployment can help the engineering team refine detection logic, enhance automation, and address blind spots.
5. Enhanced Collaboration: Involving the SOC analyst fosters a deeper understanding between teams. Engineers gain valuable insights into the real-world challenges analysts face, which can inspire innovations to streamline investigation and response.

---

Shift structure

The SOC is an inherently high-pressure environment where every second counts and the stakes are nothing less than the security of an organization’s most critical assets. This constant state of urgency, coupled with the unrelenting flow of alerts and potential threats, can significantly strain the SOC analysts tasked with responding. To mitigate this, it is imperative to implement a well-structured rotation schedule that prioritizes operational efficiency and the well-being of the SOC team.

Human performance is finite, particularly in high-stress situations that demand sustained focus, rapid decision-making, and technical precision. Research consistently shows that cognitive function begins to decline under prolonged stress. Decision-making slows, errors increase, and the quality of work diminishes. This can lead to missed threats, slower response times, and compromised security outcomes for SOC analysts.

Furthermore, the emotional toll of high-pressure environments—especially those involving critical incidents or prolonged shifts—can lead to burnout. Burnout manifests as physical exhaustion, emotional detachment, and reduced performance. Once it sets in, it can take months, if not longer, for an analyst to fully recover. A thoughtfully designed rotation schedule is a foundational strategy for managing stress and preventing burnout in the SOC. Here’s how it contributes to both individual well-being and overall team effectiveness:

1. Limited Continuous Exposure: By ensuring analysts rotate out of high-pressure roles—such as active monitoring or incident response—after a defined period, you allow them to reset and recharge. This prevents prolonged exposure to stress and maintains cognitive sharpness.
2. Diverse Workload: Alternating between high-intensity tasks and less demanding responsibilities, such as training, threat research, or process improvement, provides mental variety and reduces fatigue.
3. Adequate Rest Periods: Incorporating sufficient breaks within shifts and ensuring compliance with work-hour regulations allows analysts to recover physically and mentally.
4. Shift Rotation: Rotating shifts (e.g., day, evening, night) fairly across the team prevents overburdening individuals with consistently unsociable or exhausting hours.
5. Scheduled Time Off: Ensuring analysts have regular, predictable time off promotes work-life balance and long-term well-being.

A well-implemented rotation schedule not only safeguards analysts from burnout but also delivers broader organizational benefits:

• Sustained Performance: Resting and refreshed analysts can operate at peak performance, making faster, more accurate decisions under pressure.
• Lower Turnover Rates: By prioritizing mental health and work-life balance, organizations can reduce the risk of losing valuable talent to burnout or job dissatisfaction.
• Improved Team Dynamics: Balanced schedules promote fairness and camaraderie, ensuring no one feels overburdened or undervalued.
• Proactive Problem Solving: Time allocated for less stressful activities, like training or process reviews, helps analysts stay sharp and improves overall SOC.

A rotation schedule is just one piece of the puzzle. To create a truly supportive SOC environment, organizations should also consider:

• Regular Training and Upskilling: Offering learning opportunities keeps analysts engaged and prevents monotony.
• Mental Health Resources: Providing access to counseling, stress management programs, and wellness initiatives can help analysts manage the psychological demands of the role.
• Automation and Tooling: Reducing the manual workload with automated systems can alleviate pressure and free analysts to focus on higher-value tasks.
• Open Communication: Encouraging analysts to voice concerns and providing mechanisms to address workload or stress issues fosters a culture of trust and resilience.