To keep pace with the growing need for agility and flexibility, the IT industry has developed various approaches for deploying applications to the public. Traditional architecture allows you to build and manage the entire stack in-house, giving you complete control over the environment and configurations. Alternatively, modern architectures – like serverless, containerized, or microservices-based deployments – offer streamlined, scalable, and agile options that capitalize on the latest technologies.
Maintaining robust security and continuous monitoring remains essential regardless of your chosen approach. Best practices help ensure the application remains resilient, safeguarded against threats, and aligned with performance expectations in a constantly evolving digital landscape. This is where complexity arises: modern architecture fundamentally changes the lifespan and management of IT assets. In a traditional architecture, assets are long-lived, allowing organizations to use and control the same components over an extended period, making lifecycle management straightforward and predictable.
Cybersecurity strategy
Adopting a modern architecture necessitates implementing a modern cybersecurity strategy to keep these assets secure and monitored effectively. Traditional security models are often inadequate for dynamic environments, as they’re designed for static assets with predictable lifecycles and centralized control. Modern cybersecurity strategies must be agile and automated to secure temporary, distributed, and scalable assets. Critical components of such a cybersecurity strategy include:
- Automation and Orchestration: Automated security tools can integrate directly into CI/CD pipelines to apply consistent security policies, enforce compliance, and detect vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
- Zero Trust Security: The Zero Trust model (“never trust, always verify”) is critical in distributed environments. It assumes every user and asset, whether internal or external, could be compromised, enforcing strict identity and access management across all interaction points.
- Continuous Monitoring and Threat Detection: Continuous monitoring is essential for assets that frequently change. This includes real-time threat and anomaly detection through AI and machine learning to respond quickly to suspicious activity.
- Micro-Segmentation and Least Privilege: Modern architectures benefit from micro-segmentation, which isolates components to limit lateral movement in case of a breach. Enforcing least privilege access further minimizes risk by ensuring each component has only the permissions it needs.
- Cloud-Native Security Solutions: For cloud-based architectures, leveraging native security tools provided by cloud providers (such as AWS Security Hub, Azure Security Center, or Google Cloud Security Command Center) can simplify and enhance security postures, as these tools are designed for the cloud environment.
CI/CD pipeline
When implementing a CI/CD pipeline, inspecting the source code and ensuring the security of all components is essential but sometimes highly challenging. In modern development, applications often rely on numerous third-party libraries, frameworks, and subcomponents, many of which are pulled from public repositories or package managers during deployment. While this enables rapid development, it introduces several security challenges, as each component can have its own dependencies that may not be thoroughly vetted. These are some of the things to think about when tackling these complexities in a CI/CD pipeline:
- Dependency Scanning and Management: Use automated dependency scanners to analyze all components and subcomponents. Tools like Snyk, Dependabot, and OWASP Dependency-Check can scan dependencies for vulnerabilities as they’re integrated into the pipeline, alerting teams to outdated or risky components.
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA): SCA tools go beyond dependency scanning by analyzing the software’s entire “bill of materials” (BOM). They identify open-source components, track their licenses, and check for known vulnerabilities, ensuring that each component, including every discovered subcomponent, is secure and compliant with policies.
- Strict Dependency Control and Locking: Implement dependency version locking to prevent builds from pulling unexpected components that may have introduced vulnerabilities. Lockfiles (e.g., package-lock.json, Pipfile.lock) ensure the identical versions are used consistently across builds.
- Isolation and Sandboxing: By isolating CI/CD environments in containers or virtual machines, any potentially risky component or subcomponent is limited in its ability to interact with other system parts. Sandboxing also prevents the pipeline environment from being directly impacted by vulnerabilities that may exist in third-party dependencies.
- Dynamic and Static Security Testing (DAST/SAST): Integrate DAST and SAST tools in the pipeline to scan both the source code and the running application for vulnerabilities. These tools can catch potential security flaws introduced by subcomponents or dependencies.
- Regular Updates and Patch Management: Depend on automated alerts for when components require updates, as vulnerabilities may emerge over time. Setting automated patching in CI/CD or creating a regular schedule for dependency reviews is essential for staying ahead of new risks.
- Security Gate Implementation: Configure security gates within the CI/CD pipeline to halt the build or deployment if certain thresholds are met (e.g., critical vulnerabilities detected). This ensures that potentially vulnerable components don’t progress further into production environments.
Implementing these practices within a CI/CD pipeline can make it much more feasible to answer the question, “Are all components secure?” It’s a layered approach, combining tools and practices to mitigate the risk of insecure components and subcomponents sneaking into production, especially when their provenance is less controlled.
Threat Modelling
In containerized and serverless environments, the lightweight nature of assets often limits the implementation of traditional, heavy security controls like anti-malware, EDR/XDR, and complex firewall configurations. While these tools are still valuable, they are less applicable within modern cloud-native environments’ temporary, modular, and stateless structure. This architectural shift necessitates a different approach to threat modeling and security control placement. When creating a threat model for applications in these environments, it’s crucial to account for the following considerations:
- Shift Security to the Perimeter: Since direct security controls can’t reside on the application assets themselves, many security measures need to be implemented at the network perimeter or at the API gateway. Web application firewalls (WAFs), API gateways with rate limiting and access control, and cloud-native firewalls can help filter and control traffic to the application.
- Implement Cloud-Native Security Solutions: Cloud providers often offer security solutions that align well with the container and serverless model. These include features like AWS Lambda function policies, Google Cloud’s Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP), and Azure’s Application Gateway, which can monitor, control, and secure traffic before it reaches the application.
- Use Runtime Security Tools for Containers: While traditional endpoint security may not work in container environments, runtime security tools (e.g., Aqua Security, Falco, or Sysdig) can monitor container behaviors and alert on anomalies. These tools focus on detecting potential compromises, unusual behavior, or security policy violations within container workloads.
- Rely on Immutable Infrastructure: Since containers and serverless functions are often redeployed rather than patched in place, this immutability adds a layer of security. Vulnerabilities or configuration errors are quickly remediated by redeploying a fixed image rather than patching or securing a live environment.
- Enforce Secure Configuration and Least Privilege Policies: Role-based access controls (RBAC), network segmentation, and least privilege principles are essential in container and serverless environments to limit the scope of any potential breach. This includes limiting the permissions of serverless functions or container services to only the needed resources, preventing lateral movement within the environment.
- Use Application-Level Security Controls: In modern architectures, security shifts toward the application layer. Implementing secure coding practices, token-based authentication, and encryption for data in transit and at rest helps protect the application from vulnerabilities or data exposure.
When placing these controls, consider that they’re mostly placed “in front of” the application, as you mentioned. This means security mechanisms like API gateways, WAFs, and cloud-native firewalls take on a more prominent role. This approach ensures that while the application assets may be lightweight and isolated, the application is still well-guarded by multiple layers of perimeter and runtime security tailored to modern, cloud-native environments.
Lifespan
In contrast, modern architectures often have assets with significantly shorter lifespans. Containers or serverless functions may only live for seconds to minutes, spinning up and down based on demand. This transient nature means that traditional asset management, security, and monitoring methods may not be practical or efficient. Each short-lived asset must still be secure and monitored but in a way that adapts to its fleeting existence. This requires dynamic, automated solutions to handle high asset turnover, track dependencies in real-time, and maintain visibility across the rapidly shifting environment.
In containerized and serverless environments, the short lifespan of assets creates unique challenges for cybersecurity monitoring, particularly in correlating assets with specific applications. To effectively monitor these dynamic assets as a SOC analyst, it’s essential to establish a clear strategy for tracking, tagging, and correlating each asset back to its originating application. Here’s how to approach this:
- Implement Consistent Tagging and Labeling: Apply consistent labels and tags to each container or serverless function, which can include information about the application, environment (e.g., production, staging), version, and owner. Tags are metadata associated with logs, alerts, and monitoring data, making it easier to track assets, even if they’re short-lived. Most container orchestration tools, like Kubernetes, and serverless platforms, like AWS Lambda, support tagging by default.
- Leverage Unique Identifiers for Asset Tracking: Assign unique identifiers (such as UUIDs or GUIDs) to each asset instance when it is created, linking it back to the specific deployment or CI/CD pipeline job that originated it. This allows you to correlate logs and alerts to specific deployments and code versions, simplifying root-cause analysis.
- Integrate with CI/CD Pipelines for Traceability: Connect your CI/CD pipeline to your security monitoring solution, ensuring that deployments are logged with relevant metadata (e.g., application name, version, author, and date). This metadata can be passed down to containers and serverless functions, allowing SOC analysts to trace each asset back to its origin within the CI/CD process, even if the asset’s lifespan is brief.
- Use a Centralized Logging and Monitoring Solution: Centralized logging systems (like ELK Stack, Splunk, or Datadog) can aggregate logs from various services and assign tags or metadata to each log entry based on the originating application. This makes it easier to correlate logs from short-lived assets with specific applications. These platforms often allow for log enrichment, where additional context (like the asset’s associated application) is added to each log entry.
- Apply Contextual Alerts and Correlation Rules: In your security information and event management (SIEM) system, configure alerting rules that account for the asset metadata (such as tags and identifiers). This allows SOC analysts to correlate alerts with the correct application, even if the triggering asset no longer exists. For instance, alerts can reference specific application names or deployment tags rather than asset-specific identifiers.
- Use Distributed Tracing for Enhanced Visibility: Distributed tracing solutions like OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, or AWS X-Ray provide end-to-end visibility across microservices. By implementing tracing, you can follow requests as they move through various components and correlate each request with its specific application, regardless of how long each component instance exists. Distributed tracing enriches visibility and makes it easier for SOC analysts to understand which application an asset belongs to when issues arise.
- Leverage Cloud Provider or Orchestrator-Level Monitoring: Many cloud providers offer monitoring tools that know the transient nature of containers and serverless functions. For example, AWS CloudTrail, AWS CloudWatch, and Azure Monitor can log invocations of serverless functions with associated tags and request contexts, which helps identify specific application invocations.
- Implement Role-Based Access and Network Policies: Assign roles and network policies based on application identity rather than specific instances. This helps associate any network traffic or access activity with the intended application context, providing additional attribution information.
IP Ranges
Modern architecture adds complexity when internal IP addresses are recycled across isolated environments. This can lead to overlapping IP ranges in containerized or serverless environments, where each virtual network operates independently, often reusing IP addresses without external conflict. However, these overlapping IP addresses can make incident analysis tricky for SOC analysts, especially when logged without additional context. It’s crucial to establish robust practices for tracking and resolving IP addresses in such environments to prevent misinterpretation during IP lookups.
- Log with Contextual Metadata: Ensure logs include additional metadata, such as environment name (e.g., production, staging, dev), application ID, and unique deployment identifiers. Tagging logs with this contextual data enables SOC analysts to differentiate between IP addresses used in different environments, reducing the likelihood of misinterpretation.
- Use Unique Network Identifiers or VPC Tags: Assign unique identifiers to virtual networks (e.g., Kubernetes namespaces, VPC IDs, or serverless functions) and log these with each network-related event. These identifiers help SOC analysts map IP addresses to specific environments, clarifying when IPs belong to isolated networks and avoiding incorrect conclusions in lookups.
- Implement DNS Names for Short-Lived Assets: Enable automated DNS name creation for containerized environments for each container or pod instance. Services like Kubernetes provide internal DNS names for pods and services that can be logged alongside IPs. This way, SOC analysts can rely on DNS names, which are unique within each environment, instead of IP addresses that may overlap across environments.
- Integrate Cloud-Native Network Metadata: Cloud providers and container orchestrators often provide metadata that can help SOC analysts distinguish network segments. For example, AWS uses VPC Flow Logs, and Kubernetes supports pod and service annotations that can include network details. Including such metadata in logs provides additional clarity around the context of each IP address.
- Establish Clear IP Range Documentation: Maintain detailed documentation of each environment’s IP ranges, associated namespaces, and virtual networks. Making this available to SOC analysts helps them understand the context of each IP and avoid confusion when performing lookups. Additionally, if the same team manages multiple environments, assign ranges to minimize overlaps.
DevOps
While DevOps engineers excel in building, automating, and deploying applications efficiently, their expertise often doesn’t extend deeply into cybersecurity. This gap can (and will) lead to security oversights, especially in dynamic, complex environments like containers and serverless architectures. DevOps teams are generally focused on speed, flexibility, and functionality, which can sometimes be at odds with rigorous security practices. The best approach is to foster a collaborative system where DevOps and security teams work together, each bringing their specialized skills to the table.
- Define Clear Roles and Responsibilities: Establish well-defined roles for DevOps and security teams, ensuring each understands their scope and where responsibilities overlap. DevOps engineers handle the development, deployment, and infrastructure management, while security engineers focus on securing these processes and implementing protective controls.
- Embed Security Engineers in DevOps Teams for Guidance: Embedding security engineers within DevOps teams on a consultative basis can provide real-time guidance. This enables DevOps teams to build securely from the start while security engineers proactively advise on best practices without disrupting workflows.
- Implement “Security as Code” Practices: Security as Code involves embedding security policies directly into the CI/CD pipeline. This allows DevOps engineers to incorporate security checks without needing deep cybersecurity expertise. Automated security tools can handle tasks like static code analysis, vulnerability scanning, and dependency checks, ensuring basic security requirements are met during deployment.
- Utilize Security-Oriented CI/CD Pipelines: Security engineers can help configure CI/CD pipelines with predefined security gates—automatic checks that block deployments if vulnerabilities or misconfigurations are detected. DevOps teams can proceed with development while knowing security checks are in place, adding security guardrails without requiring security expertise.
- Provide Security Training and Awareness: Educate DevOps teams on key security principles relevant to their roles, such as least privilege access, secure configuration practices, and the basics of threat modeling. This enables DevOps to build with security in mind, catching and avoiding fundamental security issues during development.
- Enforce Configuration and Policy as Code (PaC): Security engineers can create policies that define approved configurations for environments, networks, and services. These policies are enforced automatically within IaC (Infrastructure as Code) scripts and deployment templates. This way, DevOps can deploy environments securely without manually managing complex security settings.
- Implement a DevSecOps Approach with Security Champions: Designate a “security champion” within DevOps teams—someone with enough security knowledge to act as a liaison between DevOps and security teams. Security champions can spot potential issues early, communicate with the security team, and foster a culture of security within the DevOps team.
- Continuous Collaboration and Feedback Loops: Foster a culture where security and DevOps teams regularly review processes and incidents, learning from any security-related incidents and improving workflows. This way, security becomes an integrated part of DevOps processes without burdening DevOps engineers with full responsibility.
By allowing each team to focus on its strengths while implementing collaborative processes, you maintain rapid development cycles and strong security postures. This approach ensures that DevOps can “perform its magic” in development while security engineers keep a protective eye on everything that enters production. This layered, cooperative strategy is key to secure, efficient operations in today’s fast-paced environments.
Vulnerability Management
One of the unique challenges in serverless, container, and microservices environments is staying ahead of the constant stream of new vulnerabilities discovered in widely used products, libraries, and frameworks. In dynamic environments, maintaining security post-deployment requires a proactive, automated, and responsive approach to vulnerability management to identify and remediate risks quickly. Here’s how to set up your environment to handle this effectively:
- Automate Vulnerability Scanning in CI/CD Pipelines: Integrate automated vulnerability scanners in the CI/CD pipeline to detect issues before deployment. Tools like Snyk, Trivy, and OWASP Dependency-Check can scan code, containers, and dependencies for known vulnerabilities as part of the build process. Any vulnerability found should be flagged, and the build should fail if the vulnerability is critical or high-risk, preventing insecure assets from reaching production.
- Implement Continuous Scanning of Deployed Assets: Assets should be continuously scanned for vulnerabilities after deployment. Tools like Twistlock, Aqua Security, and Qualys Container Security provide runtime security and continuous scanning for containers and serverless functions, alerting you to newly discovered vulnerabilities in deployed environments.
- Use Image Registries with Built-In Scanning and Versioning: Use container image registries with built-in vulnerability scanning capabilities, like Docker Hub, Amazon ECR, or GitHub’s Container Registry. Registries that support scanning can automatically re-scan stored images whenever new vulnerabilities are published, notifying you if any images contain affected components.
- Set Up Real-Time Vulnerability Alerts: Subscribe to vulnerability bulletins relevant to your environment (e.g., NVD, vendor-specific advisories, and industry feeds) and configure automated alerts for your environment. Integrate this into your incident response system so that security and DevOps teams are notified immediately of vulnerabilities that impact your stack.
- Monitor SBOMs (Software Bills of Materials): Maintain an up-to-date SBOM for each application, outlining every component and dependency in use. This allows you to identify assets affected by vulnerabilities and map dependencies quickly. Automated tools like Anchore or CycloneDX can generate and track SBOMs, making it easier to assess the impact of newly discovered vulnerabilities.
- Use Container Orchestration Policies for Fast Rollouts: Using Kubernetes or similar orchestrators, leverage rolling updates and canary deployments to deploy patches efficiently. These techniques allow you to phase updates to specific pods or microservices, making it easier to test patches and prevent downtime.
- Implement a Fast, Automated Rollback Strategy: Sometimes, patches may introduce unforeseen issues. Have an automated rollback process to quickly revert to a previous, stable version if a new patch disrupts operations or introduces new risks.
- Leverage Runtime Security with Dynamic Policy Enforcement: For serverless and containerized environments, use runtime security tools that can enforce dynamic policies, such as automatically quarantining vulnerable functions or restricting network access to flagged assets. Runtime tools like Falco for Kubernetes can detect anomalies in real-time, allowing for immediate response if vulnerabilities are exploited.
- Continuous Collaboration Between Security and DevOps: Ensure security and DevOps teams work together regularly to review and update the vulnerability management strategy. This should include simulated incident drills to test and refine patch management, response times, and processes.
By automating vulnerability detection, response, and patching processes and by embedding security at each stage of the container and serverless lifecycle, you can ensure your environment remains resilient even as new vulnerabilities emerge. This approach keeps assets secure post-deployment, minimizing potential downtime and mitigating the risk of unpatched vulnerabilities in production.
Security monitoring
Is there a big difference between security monitoring in a traditional architecture and a modern architecture environment? I would say the answer is nuanced. At a high level, the core objectives of security monitoring remain the same across both architectures: detect, respond to, and mitigate threats. However, the approach and tools may differ due to the distinct characteristics of each environment.
As highlighted in this article, modern architectures like containerized or serverless environments introduce significant challenges, such as short-lived assets, decentralized components, and dynamic infrastructure. These factors require adaptations in visibility, real-time monitoring, and contextual analysis to ensure adequate security. For example, monitoring ephemeral assets necessitates automated and highly granular tracking to keep up with rapid deployment cycles, while overlapping IP addresses in isolated environments require additional context to avoid misinterpretation.
Once these unique challenges are addressed, traditional and modern architectures can be monitored effectively using a unified security monitoring approach. This allows organizations to apply consistent security practices across environments, ensuring comprehensive and cohesive monitoring without reinventing the wheel for each architecture.
Leave a Reply